Headcount was never the strategy
Why workforce planning has stopped working for the organisations that can least afford it.
Why workforce planning has stopped working for the organisations that can least afford it.
Workforce planning, as practised in the organisations that needed it most, has been an exercise in tracking a leading indicator that stopped leading. For two decades, the right number of people, in the right roles, at the right cost, has been the proxy for strategic discipline. That proxy was always shaky. It has now broken entirely.
When the marginal cost of intelligent work approaches the marginal cost of the electricity it runs on, headcount stops indicating what it once indicated. It does not stop mattering — it stops being load-bearing for the question, "can this organisation hold its position?" The question that replaces it is harder: who in the room has the relationship capital to direct the work? That is not a planning question. That is a doctrine question.
A note from the practice four times a year — usually 1,500 words on what is happening in boardrooms that the press is not writing about yet.